They are estimated at nearly a thousand, the unfortunate migrants, deprived of their families, condemned to live a new adventure on the land of Rwanda. Anything but that.
Rwanda has 12 million inhabitants with an area of 26,328 square kilometres (equivalent to half of the province of North Kivu), this small mountainous country with multiple problems of community survival with a density of nearly 400 inhabitants per km2, wants to pass itself off as the cradle of humanism without borders.
The Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Boris Johnson has decided, in return for hard and uncertain cash, to offer as a poisoned gift jihadist networks to Paul Kagame, cost of the operation 144 million pounds sterling. For a global and coordinated jihad in the African Great Lakes region.
Through this agreement, Kigali signs the arrival of the new contingent of Islamists who were lacking in the Umma in the African Great Lakes. They will strengthen the ADF/MTM. Paradoxical nonetheless. How can Kigali, supported by France, which is fighting Al Sunnah Islamists in Mozambique, afford such an act?
The astonishment that took over the whole world at the announcement of this terrible news is justified for many reasons. First, and beyond the natural geography of this small country, Rwanda is experiencing a problem of overpopulation which has not hesitated, in a policy of “emptying the pond”, to dump a large number of its fellow citizens (Hutu) in the Great Lakes region, particularly in Kivu.
And to deprive them of the right to enjoy the land of their ancestors, they wander through the world, treated like accursed people, suffering humiliation of all kinds. Second, how can Kigali, which is trying, through various programs, to clean up part of its population and which advocates vasectomy as a means of contraception to prevent births among a target population, dare to welcome other populations in its narrow space? As we know, the great Anglo-Saxon powers endorse a de facto situation, that of seeing Hutu (refugees) integrate into the Congo.
In this case, this policy updated by Boris Johnson badly hides an idea of ”mixing Rwanda” to erase or significantly reduce part of its population. And to believe that it is on the basis of said policy that Kigali justifies its policy of destabilization of the Great Lakes region including Kivu, astonishment surrounds ridicule. Three, how to explain the change in strategy of Kigali which continues to arm certain Congolese of Kinyarwanda expression through rebellions (RCD, CNDP, M23) officially claiming to obtain the return to Kivu of their parents, refugees in Rwanda, and, from Suddenly, to be interested in people of various nationalities who have no cultural affinity with Rwanda?
Clearly, the fight of the CNDP, the M23 is only justified in this concern to cut off part of the DRC (Kivu) to annex it to Rwanda. In other words, for a revision of the borders as Pasteur Bizimungu had impatiently expressed it and many others like Roger Winter, Professor Mazrui, the Sudanese-American Dieng.
Finally, how to understand this scattering of Kinyarwanda-speaking populations (under the name Banyamulenge) in South Kivu in search of cultivable land at a time when Kigali is distributing it to others? Since the West entrusted Rwanda with the economic leadership of the region to the detriment of the DRC, the Great Lakes region has experienced the emergence of new forms of violence, criminality, territorial and identity claims as well as violent extremism and forces that strengthen this volcanic zone every day, which perpetuates armed violence and the displacement of populations.
All in all, the important part of obsessive irresponsibility belongs to the Congolese. We can only be surprised at the silence of intellectuals, notables and politicians in Kivu in particular, youth, the media, citizens’ movements, civil society and the Congolese diaspora when such an agreement was announced. suicidal. Tomorrow will be too late. Who says better !
Julardin Nkinzo
